Pages tagged "Environment"

  • Yes, we left the EU three years ago. But we are still European.

    Today marks three years since the UK withdrew from the European Union. Remember these?

    Read more
  • "MPs need the courage to save our environment and kill the Brexit Bill", Stanley Johnson

    It was only a matter of time before the Government invited full-blown rebellion in its attempts to scrap standards and protections that originated in the European Union. MPs have finally woken up to what all this means for legislation we take for granted and what it will do to our environmental protections. 

    As an architect of the EU Habitats Directive and former vice-chair of the European Parliament’s Environment Committee during my time as an MEP, I take a great interest in this Government’s commitment to protecting the environment. As Environment Secretary Therese Coffey said in reply to the Director General for Democracy at the Council of Europe, we should be “maintaining and, where possible improving, environmental standards and continue to deliver international obligations”. 

    Today (17/01/23) I will be speaking at the Castle Environment Debate summarising the critical outcomes of the UN Biodiversity Conference (COP 15) in Montreal last month as they appear in the Kunming-Montreal Global Framework Agreement. 

    This framework establishes a global commitment to halt and reverse biodiversity loss, protect 30% of global land and ocean, and restore 30% of degraded land by 2030. This a much-needed and welcome step to restore biodiversity across the globe. 

    A link between climate goals and nature-based solutions is the key to a meaningful response to the climate emergency. The agreement brokered last month sets out a commitment to end human-induced-species extinctions of known threatened species by 2030. It establishes a new international fund to tackle the nature crisis and agrees to install a new multilateral system to share the benefits arising from the use of genetic information. 

    And while global leaders take the steps required to answer the significant environmental challenges of our lifetime, the UK Government is threatening to weaken and diminish legislative protections and standards that originated from our time in the European Union. 

    The Retained EU Law Bill, which will be debated in the House of Commons on Wednesday, gives ministers and civil servants unprecedented power to revoke and amend standards and regulations that we have taken for granted. 

    Almost 4,000 individual pieces of legislation are at risk, nearly 1,000 of which are vital environmental and wildlife protections that my colleagues and I worked tirelessly to establish in the European Parliament. 

    The Retained EU Law Bill proposes a ‘sunsetting’ mechanism meaning that these laws that have not been rewritten, amended, or retained by the end of 2023 will simply disappear. 

    When Jacob Rees-Mogg first introduced the Bill, over 79 environmental organisations warned that this could put legal protections for 600 Areas of Special Conservation at risk. They create uncertainty for businesses, shatter long-term sustainability of our economy, and unleash environmental losses that could reduce the quality of life for millions of people here in the UK. 

    Where is the Government’s consistency?

    (Photograph: Peter Byrne/PA)

    This Brexit-at-any-cost-Bill will run roughshod over critical EU-derived environmental measures already in the statute book. Vital protections such as the UK Habitat and Species Regulations – which are the legal underpinning of the Emerald Network, the ecological network made up of Areas of Special Conservation – will be crucial for the UK’s ability to deliver the agreement reached in Montreal last month. 

    Of course, there is more that we can do, and I will go on record tomorrow calling for a package of specific, agreed scientific indicators to track our progress globally for the first time in history. We need legally binding requirements to report transparently and take stock every four years to ensure we remain on track. But this builds on the work of the United Kingdom championed during our time in the European Union. We must avoid undoing what we have already achieved. 

    Key to all of this is closer cooperation with our friends in key European and international scientific bodies, not less! To achieve our global aims, the UK should rejoin bodies such as the European Environment Agency at the earliest possible opportunity. 

    As part of their “Battle for the Soul of our Country”, I have supported the European Movement’s campaign to stop the Bill and instead call the Government to provide legal minimum standards guarantee for legislation affected by it. 

    If this Government’s manifesto commitment to build “the most ambitious environmental program on Earth” has any truth to it whatsoever, it must protect those standards and kill the Retained EU Law Bill.

    Stanley Johnson is an author, former MEP and environmental campaigner. In the run-up to the 2016 EU Referendum, he co-chaired Environmentalists for Europe with Baroness Barbara Young.

  • The UK government must protect environmental standards in new trade deals

    We need to force the UK government to protect environmental and animal welfare standards in post-Brexit trade deals before it is too late, writes European Movement CEO Anna Bird.

    Read more
  • FACT CHECK: Is Green Brexit actually a thing?

    By Molly Scott Cato

    For the better half of a decade people have been arguing that Brexit could make Britain greener. This argument seems to be having a renaissance since we left the EU six weeks ago. Just this weekend Politico wrote an article titled “so green Brexit is actually a thing”Let’s break this down 


    Read more
  • We must maintain Environmental Standards

    Climate change is one of the most important issues facing not only the UK but the planet. Our wildlife is close to extinction and our environment is under huge stress. 

    Even though EU environmental regulation is not perfect, and it has not solved our climate crisis yet, without EU regulation our environment could have been in an even worse position. 

    Before joining the EU, the UK was the “dirty man” of Europe and EU regulation helped us to clean up our act. For example, we pumped sewage into the sea in the 1970s. The EU regulators, and the threat of fines, ensured that we stopped putting untreated sewage into the sea. 

    The chance for a greener UK

    The Environment Bill is a unique opportunity to protect our environment and to ensure that we are serious about tackling climate change in the future. While DEFRA has called this bill the 'gold standard' of environmental standards, the Bill softens the enforcement power we had under EU regulations. This is likely to lead to backsliding rather than reaching new heights in environmental protection. The memory of the untreated sewage being pumped into the seas before joining the EU is enough to encourage us to clean up our act. 

    All bark and no bite 

    The bill outlines the creation of the independent watchdog of the Office for Environmental Protection (OEP), to replace the environmental oversight of the EU. However, both the independence and the enforcement power of this new body outlined in the bill are questionable. Yesterday, at the second reading of the Bill Eustice was questioned on the "teeth" of the OEP.

    Despite the bill defining the OEP as separate to the government, the personnel appointments and the budget of the OEP will be determined by the government. Independence of the OEP will be essential if his new body is to match the independent watchdog powers of the EU.

    Furthermore, the enforcement powers of the OEP will be reduced to a slap on the wrist if the OEP cannot issue fines and if they do not have enough legal force to ensure compliance with environmental law. When it came to sewage in our seas, it was the force of the regulator and threat of fines that ensured that we cleaned up our act. 

    For our planet 

    Leaving the EU must not be used as an opportunity to loosen environmental regulation. We need an environmental bill that grasps this opportunity to protect our planet and maintains or exceeds EU environmental standards.